Vote No on Measure G

Argument Against Measure G



.




Don't be fooled again!


​Measure G is the "new" Measure Y- just another tax. 


G's proponents promise to use it to preserve open space, make traffic flow, polish tarnished neighborhoods, and pave streets. Who's not for that?

 

They promised the same with Y, but promises weren' t kept. That's because THIS TAX CAN BE SPENT FOR ANYTHING, so election-time promises are meaningless sales pitches, derived from years of polls paid for by you, the city taxpayer, to discover what you'll vote for.


Review of Measure Y expenditures shows voters didn't get what they believed they'd get.


Y collected $6,000,000+ a year. Where did it go? Spending for open space, traffic relief,and street construction didn't change much before and after Y's passage.


WHAT CHANGED WAS SPENDING ON CITY SALARIES AND PENSIONS. Salaries grew about $6,000,000 per year, essentially absorbing Y's tax proceeds. The city compensates too generously:our city manager earns 28% more than the Governor, her predecessor has a $159,000 pension. 


This pattern will NOT change under G. And deceptive new promises of "accountability" CANNOT GUARANTEE WHAT IS FUNDED. The city's budget shows future intent: next year 2% of Y's funds go for traffic relief, 3% for open space, 4% for neighborhoods, and 91% for general government expenses including bloated salaries and pensions. 


Proponents claim without G the city will lack funds to operate at high standards. Really? The city banks a huge cash reserve —equal to about 34% of its annual expenditures. 


This "surplus" accumulated year after year, even during the Recession, while the city talked about being broke.

 

​Measure Y's account runs its own unspent cumulative surplus -- $4,300,000 was carried forward last year. This city's not broke. Its public trust, however, is broken. 

Don't be fooled again.


Please vote NO on G  


http://www.slocity.org/cityclerk/elections/2014/Argument%20Against%20-%20Association%20for%20Responsible%20Taxes.pdf


Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Measure G



Ready to write another $1,500 check to City Hall? That’s what Measure Y’s broken promises cost your household, says Chamber of Commerce. 


With Y, City Hall promised much, but delivered little on those promises. 


They promised neighborhood improvements. They spent only $10,000 annually fixing dangerous neighborhood sidewalks, but $1,500,000 for fancy designer sidewalks downtown and motel row. Seven years later- neighborhood sidewalks remain dangerous.


They promised neighborhood flood maintenance. Target’s developers got six figures of flood funds, Seven years later- neighborhood culverts remain dangerously clogged. 


Another developer got a $1,860,000 fee waiver and $500,000 “loan” FROM TAXPAYERS. Chevron, the oil giant which hardly needs your help, may get as much as $20,000,000 from CITY TAXPAYERS to develop a toxic site. 


IS THIS WHAT YOU VOTED FOR?


Nor did they tell you Y would finance $6,000,000 a year in higher city salaries, and 23 pensions above $100,000. 


City Hall knows you’re unhappy with Y’s broken promises. So they hired a pollster, who told them: Talk about “accountability.”


New talk of “accountability” is just electioneering.


THIS TAX CAN BE SPENT FOR ANYTHING!


Don’t be fooled again. 


Vote NO on G. 


​Measure Y's account runs its own unspent cumulative surplus -- $4,300,000 was carried forward last year. This city's not broke. Its public trust, however, is broken.